Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    96
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Gamers don’t care

    If Valve was against this then they would block them from their store. This is avoiding legal consequences

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “”“gamers”“” aren’t a monolith

      Some people clearly care bc they are currently discussing it

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Another “to be fair” - what do y’all reckon is the proportion of gamers who could define kernel? (not rhetorical)

        Edit: maybe not as good as a question as how many have any opinion on kernel-level anticheat, since you don’t need to be able to define kernel to be against the anti-cheat if you’ve heard it slows down games

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well to be fair, we’re like 1% of all gamers. Most gamers don’t give a flying fuck and will gladly buy these products anyway. So the companies don’t really have much incentive to give a shit.

        • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s why it’s a big disturbing banner where most gamers don’t understand the text but know that big disturbing banner is bad. Will it affect the sales? Not at all. But it will raise the problem(mostly Linux anticheat) to the higher standing people in the gaming companies than before because now they require those top level managers to make a decision is it big disturbing banner or Linux anticheat.

          • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I highly doubt this will do anything at all to sales. But I’m just guessing. Maybe it will. Hopefully! But I still applaud the change by Valve. I think it’s great.

            • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I don’t think the point is to do anything on sales. Valve profit from sales. It’s to raise the problem so now the managers have to decide on a scale how much they abuse the players. Before it wasn’t even a problem, now it’s Valve: “maybe you shouldn’t wink wink”

              • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Well yea, I don’t think Valve wants to nuke their own sales, lol. I think they don’t want any devs doing any funny business and abusing anti cheat. That’s my guess.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        10 hours ago

        “””gamers””” aren’t a monolith

        That’s why some people discussing it aren’t going to do anything to dissuade the practice

        • kopasz7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Games have been buried in negative reviews for less. We can’t tell in advance.

          But implying you know, and can speak for all people who play games is just bafflingly ignorant and conceited.