I’m aware of the NCIS scenes, what else you guys got?

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Dark Knight trilogy really wanted to be a realistic, grounded take on the Batman mythos, so they dropped the more fantastical elements of some characters’ backstories. Ra’s Al Ghul was no longer immortal, Bane didn’t have super steroids, the Joker wasn’t permanently bleached by chemicals…then there’s Two-Face.

    I guess they thought acid burns were too unrealistic, so they gave him regular burns…apparently without knowing that burns that severe would be so painful that he wouldn’t even be able to remain conscious, much less run around the city on a killing spree. I mean, you can see exposed muscle in some places. There’s a line where Gordon says he’s rejecting skin grafts, and I remember thinking, “WTF are you talking about? He should be in a medically induced coma, not making healthcare decisions.” Half of his body was an open wound; I’m amazed he didn’t die of infection 15 minutes after he left the hospital.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      It always bothered me that two-face has no pronunciation problems with only half a pair of lips

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 months ago

        This might be the only time we’ll see somebody complain that somebody is speaking too clearly in a Chris Nolan movie.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I read this as “No Pronoun Problems” and was like, dayyum, Two Face got my vote. Hell yeah de-gender those bathrooms in the Two-Face Goon cave.

      • mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        He should have also lost the one eye, like if your eye lids were burnt off there is going to be definite damage to the eye itself. Looked fuckin’ rad though so he’s got that going for him.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      He could also talk normally despite half of his lips being gone.

      The Nolan movies always cared more about giving the appearance of realism by making everything dull and monotone than actually being realistic.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      That always killed me! Like… bro, a soft breeze should take him out. He’s not ready to be a villain, he’s ready to spend 5+ years in rehab.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was an analysis of Nolan and post-Nolan Batman that argued that once you strip away all the fantastic parts of Batman, all the Clayfaces and Mr. Freezes and Poison Ivies and the sentient robots and uncanny weirdness, all that is left is a bunch of problems that frankly the cops should be able to handle, and that Batman at that point is just a cop who is willing to violate people’s Constitutional rights.

      If Batman can be replaced by a well-outfitted SWAT team, then you’re not writing Batman well enough. Give him some insane nonsense that cops are not equipped to handle.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        all that is left is a bunch of problems that frankly the cops should be able to handle

        They could but they don’t because corruption.

        Fundamentally, Batman isn’t about solving insane problems. He’s driven by his anger to not any other kid be an orphan like him.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The pseudo-realism in those batman movies and comic book movies in general is a huge part of why I detest them. It’s like an uncanny gap or something. Comic book characters are inherently ridiculous and absurd so I can’t take them seriously. They ask me to suspend too much disbelief.

      One specific example from the batman movies is at the end of one of them, I forget which, I think a few hundred cops charge a bunch of guys with machine guns or something? And I remember thinking in the theater they are about to get mowed down World War I style. But somehow they win, they all live, and the streets aren’t flowing with a river of blood. You want me to take them seriously, while having absurd characters and situations, and then you put them in situations where they absolutely should be massacred…I just…I’m out…

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like the Sam Raimi Spider-Man movies did that well. Sure their absurd but it kinda works into the favor of the movie. Also the acting of basically everyone helped, especially Willem Dafoe chewing the scenery.