• lightrush@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if we did that, it will still die without a drastic change in costs from the CRTC.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regional co-ops (or regional branches of a national co-op) could provide wireless internet. It’s not ideal but if a person is not willing to accept Rogers, Bell or Telus, it could be acceptable.

      • lightrush@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally. But this is very different from buying TekSavvy. TekSavvy serves the vast majority of their customers via ROBeLUS’es last mile infrastructure. They can’t do that via regional wireless and so whoever buys them will have to keep paying ROBeLUS. If they can’t break even at this point, a new owner such as a co-op will have the same problem. The only owner that won’t is ROBeLUS. The only solution to this conundrum is federal intervention via CRTC, Industry Canada or the government itself. My guess we’ll hear from Jagmeet first.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          who’s in to form a co-op and buy them?

          dang, nvm. *puts sword away*

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh god no, I don’t think the suggestion is we should form a co-op that buys TekSavvy. I can think of a lot of reasons that’s impractical. But I think there is realistically a space for Internet co-ops to be viable for some parts of Canada, if not universally.