• knightly the Sneptaur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Given the results of the election, it seems that the accelerationists might have had the right idea.

    • Thevenin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Accelerationists have never been right, their argument is self-defeating.

      The heart of the accelerationist argument is equating red and blue, claiming the blues’ inability to completely undo the damage of the reds is intentional and makes them no better – that the purpose of a system is what it does.

      But by that logic, the purpose of accelerationism is to enable fascist ascent, and that makes them indistinguishable from fascists.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A burning building doesn’t get put out by watching it burn. And the fire can in fact spread to the next building. Things can always get worse because there is no bottom. Things will only get better by making them better.

      The accelerationists got what they wanted. And everyone, including them, are worse off for it. We’ve gone from not utilizing the limited time window, to avert the worst of climate change, to choosing to use that time to pollute as much as possible. We may in fact succeed in reaching 5°C before 2100.

    • natuhhlee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s likely because of them that this was the outcome. 81M votes for Biden in 2020 and 10K less this year when it really mattered?