I have to admit, my corner of tumblr seems remarkably passive about this past week. No freaking out, no mad panic, no “it’s the end of the world”

Just “meh” and “so lets move on and do what we need to do”

  • Gabe Bell@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    16 days ago

    In 2003/2004 would people have said the same thing compared to Reagan, or Nixon? That compared to Bush, Reagan seems downright reasonable, or compared to Bush, Nixon seams down right reasonable?

    I remember a lot of protests against The Patriot Act? And against Guantanamo Bay?

    I remember a lot of right-wing patriotism sweeping through the USA and people being condemned for not falling in line.

    Are you sure 2003/2004 was a more reasonable time?

    • PonyOfWar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Yes, I was also around for the Bush presidency, and I’m pretty sure. Bush had some pretty shit policies but was also very much an establishment republican who was not going to fundamentally change the system. He didn’t have a rabid cult of personality surrounding him. There was no Project 2025-type plan to turn America into a theocracy. Bush never “joked” about becoming a dictator, becoming president for life or putting his political opponents into jail. He didn’t threaten his NATO allies with letting Russia invade them.

      I could go on, but the point is: America didn’t just elect another conservative who will try to roll back LGBT rights, it elected a Mussolini-style Fascist. Thinking “Oh we’ll just vote him out in 4 years” is… optimistic.

      • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        16 days ago

        The Heritage Foundation has been around for decades, along with other think tanks that would publish playbooks just like “Project 2025.” That Project 2025 became such a big thing is because the Dems started to realize they were losing the Fuck Trump vote and wanted to rally the base without actually doing anything. Oh give the voters what they ask for? Nah give them more fear, that’ll rally them instead! Just look up their history, they have literally worked with both sides and are basically long winded op-eds The Heritage Foundation - Wikipedia

        • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          DNC tried to rally any sane Republicans, I think the results showed they reached all 3 million of them.

          It’s just that they needed to rally their base and present a plan on how they could make their lives better. They needed to remind the electorate, all that they’ve done. This all seems so familiar…

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      This presidency is a revenge tour for Trump, he even stated so himself. Millions are getting deported. Environmental regulations, human rights and workers’ rights are stated to be discarded.

      Yeah, 2003 seemed pretty reasonable.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 days ago

      In 2003/2004 would people have said the same thing compared to Reagan, or Nixon? That compared to Bush, Reagan seems downright reasonable, or compared to Bush, Nixon seams down right reasonable

      They did and, other than Reagan, they were right.

      I remember a lot of protests against The Patriot Act? And against Guantanamo Bay?

      Which are still intolerable atrocities that would never be allowed in a well-functioning society.

      I remember a lot of right-wing patriotism sweeping through the USA and people being condemned for not falling in line

      Yes, there WAS a lot, but nowhere near as much as now.

      Are you sure 2003/2004 was a more reasonable time?

      Absolutely. 100%. 2004 conservatism is to today’s fascism what sticks of dynamite are to thermonuclear weapons.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      I was 100% with you and thought W. Bush was a worse president than Trump, all the way up until January 6. All the ramifications of it are still playing out so it remains to be seen which is worse.

      Dubbya basically set in motion all the problems we face today in his failed response to 9/11 - instability and refugees from the middle east and ‘drill baby drill’ environmental catastrophe. We’re still suffering the consequences.

      Trump and anti-democracy and January 6 - the reprocussions are still playing out. His loss on Tuesday could have done a lot to right the wrongs and stop the bleeding. But now they’re going to be supercharged and the most important thing we can do is ensure that a fair vote can happen in 2026 and 2028. If that doesn’t happen we’re lost, and the deck will be heavily stacked against us.

    • cdf12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I wonder if it felt that way because we were attacked and it was an attack against all Americans , Not X segment of Americans.

      So it kinda felt like we had very different ideas of how to proceed, but it did feel like everyone was sincere about protecting the country together.

      Clearly the policy and tract the country took has been haunting us ever since, but I never got the impression that the politicians in charge were 100% self serving and had ulterior motives.