• vortic
    link
    fedilink
    4811 months ago

    Wow, this was in the town of White Settlement, TX where a resolution to change the name to “West Settlement” was rejected by a 90% vote in 2005. Interestingly, it is only 52+ white.

        • @Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -711 months ago

          It’s an effort that pays dividends far into the future. Like changing military bases named after confederates. Regardless of the effort, future generations benefit from present wisdom.

          • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            1311 months ago

            “White Settlement” is apparently the name that the Native Americans gave it in the 1800s and it stuck. Literally nothing like naming military bases after Confederates.

            • @clothes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -311 months ago

              I get that this makes it a little bit different, but practically I’m not sure it matters. People don’t care about name origins, and our relationships with names have changed since 1800. Whether or not “White Settlement” is offensive is a different question that I’m unsure about.

              • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                011 months ago

                No, it makes it a lot different. Evidently people do care about name origins, because they chose not to change the name.

                • @clothes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  Some may have! But I’d need to do research on this particular vote to make that sort of claim confidently. I suspect it was complicated, because things like this are complicated! Just like names ;)

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    I thought it said “ousts” at first. I was impressed.

      • @EatMyDick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -1011 months ago

        I can count the number of times I’ve met a cat in a public funded building. It’s zero. A library isn’t some randomly owned house or business, it’s meant as a public resource which everyone should feel comfortable using.

        Is this the hill I die on? No, but that doesn’t mean it’s a pain in the ass for a non trivial amount of people.

        • @TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          1511 months ago

          If you have a cat in your local library and it causes issues for people then you should bring it up with them. You’re acting like one singular cat in one singular library where the majority of people wanted the cat is directly and negatively effecting you.

    • Synapse
      link
      fedilink
      1011 months ago

      That is indeed a valid point. But wouldn’t you be willing to die for this adorable little fella ?

      • @EatMyDick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -411 months ago

        I mean it’s not the hill I die on lol, it’s a minor allergic reaction and I have what I need at home.

        I’m just saying that not wanting a cat in a public funded place isn’t really meme material IMO, is a pretty tame request.

        • Synapse
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Not wanting a aninal that can cause allergic reactions in a public place is absolut common sense. This is in part what makes this a good meme, I think.

    • @Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -311 months ago

      You’ll be fine. My girlfriend is a allergic to cats but she’s had one in the house for over a decade now.

      Just admit that the real reason is because you don’t like cats, and being allergic to them is a convenient excuse.