It doesn’t matter if the most upvoted comment is pro or against subject in discussion. All that matters is bolstering a comment that is minimally compatible with participant’s thinking and making it win against the opposite argument (competing and most voted one).

So it seems that the most satisfactory comment (for most readers) doesn’t really matter at all. What matters, before anything else, is visibility of an opinion that somewhat aligns with one’s thinking, rather than writing or finding the most corresponding comment for that subject, fully compatible with reader’s perception.

  • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it bothers you, why not sort by New and ignore votes?

    You’re not going to avoid herd mentality when socializing within a social species. That’s just how we work. So if it bothers you, curate your experience to how you want it.

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorting by new ends up creating a group that just picks winners and losers for those who don’t. Hence “the knights of new” with their disingenuous framing that they were doing a public service. All they were really doing, whether they knew it or not, was picking which snowballs get to roll and which don’t.

      Most, if not all, have to sort by new or it just trades issues.