Alfa@lemmy.world to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 1 year agochatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down115
arrow-up1114arrow-down1external-linkchatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comAlfa@lemmy.world to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareSimpleDev@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoNow it’s broken, I guess I I don’t use it this way often enough. Interesting nonetheless! Edit - it’s very semantic, it matters if I include an uppercase “S” or not. That’s amusing. I wonder if the temperature settings adjustment would fix that or just make it even weirder.
minus-squarenieceandtows@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThe original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
minus-squareSimpleDev@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoBut it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages. Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is. Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.
Now it’s broken, I guess I I don’t use it this way often enough. Interesting nonetheless!
Edit - it’s very semantic, it matters if I include an uppercase “S” or not. That’s amusing.
I wonder if the temperature settings adjustment would fix that or just make it even weirder.
The original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
But it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages.
Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is.
Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.