• kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That explains why we have a decimal system is some cultures, yes. But that doesn’t make it mandatory nor unintuitive to use another base.

      There have been native tribes with wildly different counting system. Base 12 is surprisingly common, as you can use other features of your hand to count.

      Regardless, the fact that base 10 arises from the number of fingers doesn’t mean counting must be based on fingers, that’s not a logical conclusion.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Base 12 is not organically common, it’s incredibly rare even with the modern counting systems we’ve discovered…

        The frequency of emergences (based on language families that use them) are: 4 ~1 time, 5 ~4 times, 6 ~3 times, 8 ~2 times, 10 ?? times, 12 ~3 times, 15 ~1 time, 20 ~9 times, 20+5 ~2 times, 23 ~1 time, 24 ~1 time, 27 ~1-2 times, 32 ~1 time, 60 ~2 times

    • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we had 8 fingers, or 3 fingers, or 15 fingers, we would still be using base 10. It’s just that the value of “10” would be different each time

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but (1) that isn’t the only base system humans use and (2) aliens could use a base system entirely divorced from their body parts. So number of fingers doesn’t have to dictate which base system is used.