Seems pretty basic to me and only good if you butter them.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Small cakes baked in greaseproof paper cups are called buns in some parts of the country, but they’re about a quarter of the size of the US-style muffin. They’re also known as fairy cakes, party buns and possibly a handful of other names to avoid confusion with other baked goods that may also be called buns.

      The person who said that many of us here think of the US-style muffin when muffins are mentioned is telling the truth. (Edit: clarification)

      Now if you want a local delicacy (I use the term loosely) that has a well-known name and origin within England, with widespread appeal and no doubt large consumption, look no further than Yorkshire puddings. I ate one myself earlier today as part of a meal.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Those people were the weird ones, then. This is a bun.

      If you do weird things, like mistaking muffins for bread rolls, I’m gonna call you weird. It’s not a personal attack, it’s an accurate description based on what I can see. You seem to have been misinformed, but are also trying to explain my own culture to me incorrectly, so I downvoted you. I think that’s fair.

      • KoboldCoterie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s a dinner roll. Now show us what a roll is over there, this is interesting!

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        11 hours ago

        My last message to you is that acting like that is a personal attack and you shouldn’t do that IRL or online.

        • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You’re here trying to explain my own culture to me, and you’re not even right about it, and you’re upset I’m upset about it? Is the phrase “personal attack” just your way of demonising the consequences of your own actions?

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Sigh, ok one more message. If you said “I think you are incorrect, we call this …” that would be fine and polite manners. But you didn’t do that. You went for a personal attack. Yes calling people weird is a personal attack. Ok I’m out.

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              I think you are incorrect, an accurate description is not a personal attack.

              Either you referred to what we call “buns” as “muffins” (and ate them without anything in them), which is weird, or you thought we called muffins “buns”, which is also weird. And you were sticking to your guns while american-splaining to a brit about british culture (without even being right), which is weird and kinda offensive.

              I’ve had enough of people hiding their bad behaviour behind a wall of “please be civil”. I will be as uncivil as I like in calling out bad behaviour, and I will think very poorly of anyone who thinks I shouldn’t.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Calling someone weird is a personal attack.

                Saying that what they said is weird is not. Attack the argument, not the person.