Can you imagine what would have happened during WW2 if that had passed? There were a number of Americans sympathetic towards the Nazis, and a much larger number of Americans sympathetic towards the Allies, but not sympathetic enough to risk the lives of their sons, fathers, and husbands. I struggle to see a world where a national vote would have resulted in a large enough majority.
I imagine it would have extended the war by at least another five years. I do think the Nazis would still have lost eventually, as they struggle to maintain control over the entirety of Europe whilst also trying to destroy the UK and Russia. But it would likely have been a Pyrrhic victory, leaving both victors almost completely decimated too.
Not a bad idea, but how would it work with the right to an anonymous vote?
The US hasn’t formally declared war since 1942, I expect this amendment would have simply pushed that date earlier.
I like the idea, but in today’s world of perpetual warfare it would not work.
I’m pretty sure they just did an end run around this when they knew it wasn’t going to work by making the Selective Service Act of 1917, where all men over 18 have to be registered for the draft. I had to sign up for selective service even though the draft no longer exists because they might one day bring it back, especially now they can’t meet the recruitment numbers.
This doesn’t seem particularly useful in the modern day. If you want to win a war today, you do it with highly trained soldiers and highly advanced equipment, not by handing rifles to a bunch of green volunteers or conscripts.
Plenty of jobs going in the military. If you support the war, support the war
Not that many jobs. If fully half of the country supported an act of war, there would be nowhere near enough military jobs for them to fill.
That’s only because we haven’t actually gone to war in a long time. Showing off our shiny toys in Desert Storm wasn’t a full scale war. Nor have any of our other excursions been. But a fight with China? You bet your ass we’d need a never ending line of barely trained soldiers to keep up with the bloodshed. We can only hope such an event never happens.
A fight with China would be over within hours, leaving both countries reduced to radioactive craters. We won’t even need soldiers for that, let alone cannon fodder.
With a larger aging population it wouldn’t work very well, but what if was an income tax instead? Like maybe 2%
If the aging population wants to go fight a war, let them.
Queue the “I’d rather send those less fortunate than myself to war and treat veterans like shit when they get back” comments
I kinda like that
Bring this back.
How fucking old is this story?
This is from 2013.
So? Today this person learned about. It doesn’t say “Today I and Everybody Else Also Learned”. I’d never heard of this proposed amendment, why does it matter that the article is old?
@wet_lettuce knew it, so therefore everybody had to have known of it. That’s how human knowledge works: one human learns it and thus do all humans.
It is known!
