• PizzaMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious to hear your perspective on that.

    Ramaswamy’s response to the pansexual women is about as out of touch as one can get. Him saying that the LGBTQ+ is a bunch of groups is just a thinly veiled effort to weaken the power of the LGBTQ+ through propoganda. He wants to act like republicans are the victims when the LGBTQ+ receive death threats and attacks on a routine basis. He also just straight up doesn’t understand much about the LGBTQ+. Basically the whole thing he uses nonstop strawman fallacies. He has a fundamental lack of understanding of everything he criticized through the whole thing. And in the end it’s culture war bullshit.

    If you’re aware of a more appropriate word, I’m all ears.

    “The decline of christianity”

    Every time I look to Christ for guidance

    Even if we have free will that isn’t an instance of you changing your mind of your own free will. These things you list are just examples of you performing actions that are in line with your beliefs.

    The foundation of Western civilization is not, and cannot, be infested with termites, because the foundation of Western civilization is the Lord our God.

    I disagree that the foundation of western civ is solely placed on god. There are a lot more things that go into it than that:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Western_civilization

    If you’re going to look through this, I recommend spending extra time on the section explaining the enlightenment.

    There’s nothing you can say to legitimately criticize God.

    Sure I can, god, according to your worldview, created a world in which children get cancer. I can conceptualize a world in which that does not happen, and therefore a failure of god. And before you say I think I know better than god, in reality I know better than the humans who made god up.

    If we don’t know how something works, of course we can ascribe the answer to God, and that answer is always correct.

    That’s a terrible thing to do because it is a form of lying to yourself. In the end it wasn’t Zeus who causes lightning, it is a build up of a difference in energy between clouds and the ground. Answering “god” in that context was wrong. We shouldn’t just blame a mystery on a bigger mystery.

    It’s created by God to work in a certain way, and we’ve deduced the mechanism by which it happens.

    No part of the explanation for how lightning works involves god.

    But it misses the vast all-encompassing nature of God’s glory, so it doesn’t seem like a very compelling answer.

    People prefer real answers rather than ones that just blame a bigger mystery.

    The most intelligent scientists all believe in God.

    Not only is that not true (because you added the “most intelligent” qualifier), but given that scientific literacy is correlated with atheism, I find it to be rather damning for religion:

    https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2009/11/Scientists-and-Belief-1.gif

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

    If god really is the answer for everything all around us we would expect those who understand the universe better than the average population to understand god better than the average population. Yet we see the opposite.

    Einstein is the most notable example.

    He was a really weird deist, not a christian. And he was from a time when it was far less socially acceptable to be an atheist. So that’s not really much of an argument.

    I would now if I picked it back up.

    Go for it! It’s pretty easy to play against others nowadays now that there are so many popular chess sites. chess.com and lichess are pretty decent.

    • 10A@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ramaswamy’s response to the pansexual women is about as out of touch as one can get.

      I wasn’t referring to that in particular. I was referring to the big-picture point he made in the whole last 11 minutes of the video. The point was about western civilization, the insidious project to undermine it, and our duty to defend it. That point is foundational to much of our disagreement. It sounds like you stopped watching before he even got to the point.

      “The decline of christianity”

      Yeah, but that misses the bigger picture. It’s not as if people are rejecting Christ and converting to Judaism. Rather it’s a secular movement driven by Satan’s success at convincing a vast swath of the populace that God is imaginary.

      I disagree that the foundation of western civ is solely placed on god.

      This is one of those ways in which Wikipedia tends to be secular. It says in the intro that Western civilization is “linked” to Christiandom. That’s misleading. Western civilization is Christiandom. The only difference is we don’t call it that anymore. But everything that followed from Christiandom is built upon Christiandom as an extension of Christiandom. Though to the article’s credit, it does later state that:

      […] Western civilization, which throughout most of its history, has been nearly equivalent to Christian culture.

      That’s close to accurate. In truth the two are inseparably identical, which is why Satan hates Western civilization, that that in turn is why you’ve been convinced to believe you want to contribute to the project of undermining Western civilization.

      If you’re going to look through this, I recommend spending extra time on the section explaining the enlightenment.

      I’m not sure exactly what points you’re referring to here. Skimming through it, I’m pretty sure I already know all of these details. The only change I’d make is to emphasize God’s role in all of these things, and His importance to all of these historical figures.

      Sure I can, god, according to your worldview, created a world in which children get cancer.

      It is the height of hubris to criticize God. His wisdom is infinite, and if yours was too then you’d understand why certain children are given cancer. It’s not for us to try to understand. It’s for us to accept in our worship and prayer.

      And before you say I think I know better than god, in reality I know better than the humans who made god up.

      At some point, immanently I hope, you’ll realize how absurdly wrong you are about this. You have demons whispering lies into your ears, and you believe them unquestioningly. I know they make it feel good when you believe them, but they’re lying to you.

      In the end it wasn’t Zeus who causes lightning, it is a build up of a difference in energy between clouds and the ground.

      Comparing Zeus to God is far worse than apples and oranges, because at least apples and oranges are both fruits. It’s like comparing icebergs to smartphones. They have absolutely nothing whatsoever in common, to the point that it’s nonsensical to even try to compare them.

      Let’s say you were to throw a basketball, and make a basket. Some scientists observe it, and say “That’s interesting. Let’s figure out what that’s all about.” So they observe you throwing the basketball. They measure your movements, the wind movements, the ball’s PSI, the height of the basket, the material compositions of the ball and basket, just all of it. And then they formulate a theory which postulates how the ball goes through the basket. And then people start to deny that you exist because they have the theory of how the basketball goes through the basket. The whole idea is absolutely ridiculous. God is in control, no matter what your demons tell you.

      Not only is that not true [that the most intelligent scientists all believe in God] (because you added the “most intelligent” qualifier), but given that scientific literacy is correlated with atheism, I find it to be rather damning for religion:

      First off, it’s self-evidently true, as anyone who denies God cannot be said to be very intelligent. I’m trying to word that so as not to offend you, and it’s hard. Sorry. My point here is not to insult you, but just to explain my statement about the most intelligent scientists.

      Secondly, the scientific disciplines are certainly attractive to atheists who want to devote their lives to pretending that they’re disproving God by collecting the evidence of the basketball. So yes, atheists are more likely to become scientists than pastors. We don’t need to consult any studies to know that’s true.

      Go for it! It’s pretty easy to play against others nowadays now that there are so many popular chess sites. chess.com and lichess are pretty decent.

      Maybe eventually, but not today. I have too much else on my plate. But thank you for letting me know it’s easy to play online. That’s something I hadn’t considered.

      • PizzaMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was referring to the big-picture point he made in the whole last 11 minutes of the video.

        I am aware that isn’t the focus that you had in mind, but it was one of the bigger reactions I had to it. My overall view is that he is deeply out of touch and incapable of using anything other than a strawman argument. He fundamentally does not understand what he is criticizing.

        It’s not as if people are rejecting Christ and converting to Judaism.

        That’s not what “The decline in chrstianity” describes.

        Rather it’s a secular movement driven by Satan’s success at convincing a vast swath of the populace that God is imaginary.

        That’s just not happening.

        Western civilization is Christiandom.

        No it’s not. Western civ is a pretty arbitrary phrase that is used in a million different ways, and christianity is only a subset of that. Words and phrases change over time, and this is one of those things that has changed.

        the project of undermining Western civilization.

        There is no such project, at least how I define western civilization.

        I’m not sure exactly what points you’re referring to here. Skimming through it, I’m pretty sure I already know all of these details.

        If you’re aware of all the details then you should also be aware that the enlightment (a huge part of western civilization) was the birth of science, the scientific method, and secularism. Meaning christendom != western civ.

        It is the height of hubris to criticize God. His wisdom is infinite

        I am criticizing a fictional, human made character. As a result of being human made, there is no such infinite wisdom.

        if yours was too then you’d understand why certain children are given cancer.

        There is no good reason.

        It’s not for us to try to understand. It’s for us to accept in our worship and prayer.

        How have you determined that you aren’t worshiping an evil god if you haven’t questioned god? How do you know that it isn’t the case that both god and satan are evil?

        You have demons whispering lies into your ears, and you believe them unquestioningly.

        Nobody is whispering anything in my ears, metephorically or literally, whichever way you mean. And I question everything before I believe it.

        Comparing Zeus to God is far worse than apples and oranges, because at least apples and oranges are both fruits. It’s like comparing icebergs to smartphones. They have absolutely nothing whatsoever in common, to the point that it’s nonsensical to even try to compare them.

        Both Yahweh and Zeus are fictional characters which people irrationally use to explain why things work. That was the basis for my comparison and therefore makes it a valid comparison.

        And then people start to deny that you exist because they have the theory of how the basketball goes through the basket. The whole idea is absolutely ridiculous.

        That’s not really how that works.

        it’s self-evidently true, as anyone who denies God cannot be said to be very intelligent.

        That’s not true.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

        scientific disciplines are certainly attractive to atheists who want to devote their lives to pretending that they’re disproving God by collecting the evidence of the basketball.

        That is absolutely not why people do science. They do so because they want to learn more about the universe, do some good for humanity and advance it. Do you even know a single scientist?