• sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think the idea is to put the responsibility for housing onto society/authority as opposed to the victim.

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Perhaps to some people, but to me it does sound like a homeless person just happens to be without.

        Whereas an unhoused person has been let down by whoever is responsible for ensuring people are housed.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I dont see how. If anything, its just a matter of time until you see houseless as being their fault. Because the baggage is something you (and society in general) is adding. Its not implicit in the word itself.

          • sunbytes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve been using it a couple of years now and I’m not victim blaming yet.

            But I guess “a matter of time” is pretty open ended.

            I tell you what though, it’s a personal choice, so you keep saying homeless if you like.