Summary

Elon Musk has called homelessness a “lie” and “propaganda,” claiming advocacy groups profit from maintaining high homelessness rates.

Partnering with Donald Trump, Musk is pushing for drastic federal budget cuts targeting programs for vulnerable populations, including food stamps and healthcare.

Trump’s plan includes forcing unhoused individuals into treatment or institutionalization.

Critics argue these approaches criminalize homelessness while ignoring root causes like lack of affordable housing.

Homelessness in the U.S. has reached record levels, with 650,000 people affected in 2023, prompting calls for evidence-based solutions over punitive measures.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ah yes, it is a “life style” choice and all that jazz… Not at all the inevitable result of decades plus of poor governance/systemic failures.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is the danger of elite projection. What his life is like must be how other people’s lives are like.

    He was successful. If he wanted to get a job, he could. If he did work, he got paid.

    If these people aren’t doing that, it must be their fault, and they need “treatment” (via institutionalization) in his mind. It couldn’t possibly be because to get a job, you often need existing housing, but to get housing, you need money from a job. Or the fact that people like him don’t pay enough.

    It’s always their fault. Individual responsibility, meritocracy and all that jazz.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    For someone that claims to be so data-driven, I’d be curious what data he is looking at here when he calls it a lie. I will say that it is factual that the US spends a lot of money on homelessness and we still have homelessness, but the existence of homelessness is not something I would call a lie.

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If his data driven claims aren’t just complete bullshit, the data he is talking about tells him that saying this type of shit will get him something he wants. Whether homelessness is real doesn’t matter to him.

      If his data driven claims are bullshit, he probably saw a homeless person who didn’t look exactly like a Hollywood movie homeless person so, per his tiny, tiny idiot brain, they must be faking homelessness.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What if Luigi was acquitted and launched a startup that sold guillotines at cost…

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Market Capitalism needs homelessness.

    If you will not make the owner’s money through labor, You will help them make money as capitalist scarecrows. A warning to any laborer thinking of failing to comply.

    You WILL serve the owner’s greed disease, or else.

    It would literally be cheaper to house them without conditions than all the conditioned programs and homeless encampment clean up costs.

    But that doesn’t send a message of fear.

    Herp derp Freedom 🇺🇸

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If there’s one homeless person on the street, people will say “they’re lazy, you need to work harder”. If there’s 100 homeless people on the street, people realize “something’s wrong with our society/system”, and demand change.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “claiming advocacy groups profit from maintaining high homelessness rates.”

    Uhhh . . . how? “You there! Go be homeless! I need to profit from your utter lack of income.”

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Social workers making literally tens of thousand of dollars a year off of this. That’s enough to be rich according to people who make that much while eating a french fry.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Oooo. “Tens of thousands” you say? It almost sounds like keeping people from dying in the street should be a full-time job.

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      He’s sadly got a bit of truth there.

      I’ve heard it called the homeless industrial complex, groups get public sector funding to purchase necessities and camping equipment for distribution. Occasionally drop shipping it and paying themselves or some other double Irish maneuver.

      Then the encampment gets bulldozed/ razed/ robbed/ flooded and its all destroyed along with any progress the unhoused have managed and all their belongings and reserves.

      And they get handed new tents and socks and instant ramen etc.

      Meanwhile the persons medical care from sleeping outside skyrockets occupying a large chunk of their discretionary time. As a huge obstacle to getting back on their feet.

      So the government is paying someone to help them sleep outside, and paying for the consequences of them sleeping outside, and collecting no tax revenue.

      Might as well just give them an apartment, if the cruelty wasn’t the point that is.