The pledge was born out of shareholder activism — and was withdrawn as regulators crack down on greenwashing.
It’s almost like corporations are run by vacuous sociopathic immoral criminals, whose sole goal is the acquisition of wealth.
Regulations with teeth are a requirement for preventing corporate criminals from succeeding, and ensuring a level playing field, competition, and market success; otherwise the immoral and unethical have an inherent advantage, because crime pays and morality is expensive.
The scary thing here is that the pledges came out of shareholder activism. If the corporation will not do what the shareholders ask of it, then who is calling the shots?
We often hear that CEOs have no choice but to put profits ahead of morals because they are obliged to deliver profits to the shareholders. We can see here, that they’re prepared to act against the wishes of the shareholders, so that excuse is clearly untrue.
i been sick of that “a ceo’s only responsibility to shareholders” line. just like i been sick of people saying in america that corporations are legally required to maximize profits for the shareholders. this lets greedy oligarch fucks off the hook for their evils by portraying it as inevitable.
before reagan, one of the primary functions of government was holding greedy fucks accountable. reagan introduced alignment. from him on, government has been run by and for greedy oligarchs who just want to make themselves rich, everyone else, including the shareholders, be damned. our last chance to start reversing that process through elections was probably in 2000 when we didn’t elect gore. we’ve been doomed ever since to someone like the next president.
we did elect gore, he didn’t have the heart to fight for it
If the corporation will not do what the shareholders ask of it, then who is calling the shots?
Mutual fund managers, especially of the big index funds at Vanguard, Blackrock, Schwab, Fidelity, etc. They get to vote all the shares of the working-class investors whose 401(k)s are invested in those funds, and I’m pretty sure they always vote for whatever management recommends as a matter of policy.
In other words, the thing that’s supposed to be a check & balance against management fuckery… isn’t.
Ban plastic bottle packaging. Nothing short of that is going to stop plastic waste. We have metal and glass. We can reuse and recycle those materials fairly easily.
I never understood the switch from glass in the first place.
Costs. Plastic is a lot cheaper than glass.
Fuck Coca-cola. All my homies drink Kofola (from deposit glass bottles).
Kofola is the GOAT.
You guys need to export that shit more, Czechia would conquer the world
Coca Cola uses deposit glass bottles in much of the world, aside from the US. This country just dum.
aside from the US
and europe.
I have only seen 250/330 ml bottles of Coca-Cola. And for some reason they are not sold in regular supermarkets. You can only buy them in METRO or in restaurants.
And we were into even the nineties. It was sorta hard to find but I was definitely still able to get it in 91. Im more of a pepsi person but I would buy coke because I could still get the tall bottles. They still have the short from glass around but not on a deposit basis.
If someone needs more reasons to boycott Coca-Cola, they also have ties to Israel
