• Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    He’s young. He’s still working out his view of the world. Of course he’s gonna investigate ideas, accepting some and rejecting others. He’s not far off.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m not suggesting which ideas are right and wrong, or which he would accept or reject.

        I’m saying he’s young and seeking out ideas. Of course some will be problematic. He might reject them. He might not. Regardless, just the fact that he was curious is a point in his favor.

        I’m much older than him and this is the first time I’ve heard of “effective altruism.”

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’m not suggesting which ideas are right and wrong, or which he would accept or reject

          you: thinks one is doing this with care and finesse

          nobody:

          everyone else: 🤨

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I wasn’t criticizing stoicism or effective altruism because I’m not informed enough on them. I wasn’t criticizing rationalism because I’m in favor of it. But I’m willing to bet if society has managed to fuck up stoicism and altruism, we’ve probably done the same with rationalism too.

            I wasn’t addressing which ideas or positions he was taking because I can’t see inside his head. I have no idea how he thinks, or which paths he has taken. I don’t know how he will change in the future. That would be presumptuous.

            I do like that he is curious. That’s a good quality in a person. Not everyone is.

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              I… have to ask: are you actually aware of what the hell the context is of the things that you’re commenting about?

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I literally just said that this is the first time I’ve heard of effective altruism. I read what others said about it here, and it doesn’t sound good. I have generally favored what little I’ve read about stoicism, but apparently it’s become problematic too. I know better than to talk about ideas that I’m unfamiliar with. Is it a problem that I refuse to assert any kind of intellectual authority where I have none?

                So what I said was I appreciate the fact that he is curious. I remember when I was his age. I believed in some batshit crazy things. I was a devout fundamentalist christian, a young earth creationist, an incel before they used the word. You know how I broke free of all that? Insatiable curiosity. I filled my head with other people’s ideas. Cognitive dissonance forced me to abandon bad ideas and I clung to good ideas until I was able to form a solid foundation for how to face reality. Rationality was critical to that process.

                I’m not prepared to criticize the ideas and positions he was curious about. But I do praise a curious mind. Young people are still forming their positions. Part of that process is investigating ideas, accepting the good and rejecting the bad. I don’t know how he will turn out. But curiosity is a good quality.

                • froztbyte@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  okay a lot of that is good and all, but here’s the flipside: a lot of these fuckwits outright prey on naïve curiousity. it is one of their biggest feeders for taking in people who don’t yet know any better

                  and that’s kinda the point. broadly I agree with you, but curiousity is/can be a dangerous thing

                  (also the reason I asked was the framing of one of your statements, so: Rationalism, big-R specifically. congratulations on learning about some of the worst people around)

                  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Yes, I’ve gradually become aware of that. You make a good point. It famously tends to kill cats.

                    I managed to avoid a lot of that, somehow, fortunately. I know my path isn’t everyone else’s and I certainly wouldn’t wish mine on anyone. I dumped Kent Hovind and Ken Hamm and went straight to people like Carl Sagan and Mr Rogers, and made a bunch of leftist and gay friends I’d always been warned to avoid. I never understood the appeal of Jordan Peterson and his ilk.

                    Actually, I did still get hooked by Graham Hancock for a few weeks a while back. But I’m guarded against grandiose claims and quickly checked out his critics. Lesson learned. I may be vaccinated, but I’m not immune.