• Hardeehar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really. It’s more like:

    Everyone ending

    One innocent ending to keep everyone else alive

    That’s more challenging.

      • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I would say “life is a struggle”. Of course it’s challenging, it doesn’t mean that it’s bad.

        Regardless, what’s your point?

        • the_q@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You use the word struggle to give some kind of meaning to the suffering.

          My point is that there is no answer to the question because life is suffering.

      • SeahorseTreble@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but I think those being explicitly tortured will be suffering a lot more than the average person. We can define it as that for the hypothetical anyway xD

    • NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      More challenging is to remove the benefit of answering as a bystander and hand over an active role, so now the question is would you torture an innocent to keep the world alive. Then question progresses to what if that innocent is someone you care most about to see the extent of their resolve