One thing really annoying that I’ve noticed working in the white collar industry is that some people get a free pass all the time on important things, just because they have kids. For example, in a different team who often has to step away during business hours and becomes unreachable, simply because they have kids. There’s always some sort of excuse with them. Have to go pick him up from the bus stop, have to go pick him up from school because they got in trouble, dance recital during the middle of the day, always something. But when it comes to ordinary normal people who don’t have kids, it feels like there’s a lot more scrutiny. Why do you need a doctor’s appointment in the middle of the day? Why do you need to go pick up a prescription at lunch time, like why can’t you work through lunch?

But also, when it comes to employment, it feels like there’s a lot of preferential treatment for people with children. Oh that person has kids / children! They need the job a lot more. They have a little girl! Clearly they need it more than the the person who has a disabled spouse, because kids are way more important than an adult dependent! We can’t fire this person, they have kids! Let’s choose someone who doesn’t have a family. Like, stuff like this. Why is there so much preferential treatment to people who have children? Is this some sort of utilitarian thing? The least number of people affected?

  • ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Reproductive labour is the largest segment of labour and entirely necessary to the continuation of society yet is entirely unpaid. Why is that and why do you think that someone contributing to that segment of the labour economy should be treated the exact same as someone not doing that unpaid labour? You say it is entirely their choice yet you benefit from that labour without contributing to it. That is your choice

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Earth is overpopulated.

      There’s an argument to be made that the “reproductive labour” is as good for humankind as “extracting oil to keep polluting the atmosphere”.

      Also, most if not all people have kids for selfish reasons, not for society not for others, only for themselves, so cut the bullshit here.

      • ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        “Earth is overpopulated” is a toxic and wildly incorrect classist conspiracy theory. I am not even going to humour it.

        • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          58 minutes ago

          It’s a fact. There’s nothing more contaminating that a human being.

          We contaminate, we take a LOT of resources. There’s not enough for so many people.

          Is completely irresponsible advocate for a everlasting increase of the population. It’s just calling for human suffering and nature destruction.

          I’m not going to defend the destruction of humanskind and Earth just for some people’s whims and lack of responsibility.

          And surely I’ll never defend to give privileges to those who decide to keep overpopulating our planet. Specially because, as I said, they only do it for selfish reasons, because their whims.