• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    “moving characters to a virtual field when an event is triggered” (entering a battle)

    How is that a legit patent, when there are so many obvious instances of prior art?

    • KoboldCoterie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even if there weren’t a million examples of prior art, the fact that patents on game mechanics are even allowed is just awful for the industry as a whole, and we as players should absolutely rail against this. Every game borrows from other games’ ideas and mechanics - I’d bet money that there hasn’t been a single fully “original” game in 20+ years. If companies are allowed to patent every little mechanic (even ones they didn’t come up with), the industry as a whole will just become impossible to operate in.

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Every game borrows from other games’ ideas and mechanics

        It’s not only games, this is just straight-up how art works. Culture develops over time. Of course capitalism had to get a middleman in there lol

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        the fact that patents on game mechanics are even allowed is just awful for the industry as a whole

        Yes, definetly.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a Japanese patent. I’m not sure how it would hold up internationally, but Pocketpair is also a Japanese company and this lawsuit is entirely within the Japanese legal system. That probably gives Nintendo a bit of an advantage since they’re such a large and iconic Japanese corporation.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Copyright is already cooked, no matter where it’s located. But the way japan acts as if Pokemon invented JRPG battles is simply ridiculous.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          the way japan acts as if Pokemon invented JRPG battles is simply ridiculous.

          Am I missing some bit of context? Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy still exist (and came first).

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s what I meant with “prior art”. Nintendo’s second patent basically explains how any old JRPG worked.