Summary
Bishop Garrison, a former Pentagon official who led a 2021 investigation into military extremism, warns that recent New Year’s Day attacks by military personnel highlight the ongoing threat of radicalization and distress in the armed forces.
Despite a report recommending counter-extremism measures, its policies were never implemented, facing backlash from right-wing figures, including Trump’s defense secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth.
As Hegseth aims to dismantle counter-extremism programs, Garrison stresses the risks of neglecting the issue, citing cultural and mental health challenges within the military.
We’re not your parents or your teacher, you have to learn the value of educating yourself.
Did you seriously just tell him to do his own research? I think that’s how we got here in the first place…
Point taken, generally speaking. However jokes aside I think this kind of thinking is more along the lines of capitalist realism, i.e. the position of the zeitgeist. The “centrist,” the uninformed, and the default view. In that sense, doing your own research can go either way!
As compared to “doing your own research” to find just enough to convince yourself that you’re special and have identified something nobody else has seen before like we see with anti-science people.
Lmao. You’re the one making claims about me being wrong, so you have to provide arguments for why that is. Saying “i know why you’re wrong, but that’s for you to find out” is lazy debating
Your premise is willfully devoid of any condition or nuance for deliberate effect. It deserves no respect.
Extremes of government are authoritarian. Left or right. Extremes of personal ideologies can be violent or even terrorism. Extremism is harm.
Believing things to be good like environmental regulation, universal health care, civil rights, or even in BLM is not extreme when they seek to undo or prevent objective harm and injustice. Maybe you are deliberately being stupid to make a point, but it’s patently obvious the parent comment pointed out the hypocrisy in labeling what constitutes extreme.
I think there might have been a misunderstanding. When I mentioned left-wing extremism, I was referring specifically to ideologies like communism and their historical tendencies toward authoritarianism—not to more moderate left-wing policies like universal health care or civil rights, which I agree aren’t extreme. My point was that extremism, whether left or right, often leads to authoritarian outcomes
Then you should have expended the time to nuance your position rather than making an appeal to hypocrisy argument and wasting your and everyone else’s time. However, your argumentative follow up responses don’t really do your claim of “misunderstanding” any favors.
Forgive me for the misunderstanding 🙏. I thought it was fairly obvious what i was referring to.
here’s the kicker: you’re still wrong even with your clarification.
Left wing extremists are the likes of anarchists and Black Panthers, people fighting for equality and justice for all. Authoritarianism is a different and separate axis from the social and economic axes.
Let wing extremism is self organization and community building, left wing extremism is protecting marginalized groups.
I already said I’m not here to educate you so I’ll leave it at that, but clearly you’re trying to give yourself a pass here. You weren’t misunderstood, you’re just still wrong.
Oh i think i understand what you’re getting at now and i think we might end up being on the same page. I also prefer to use the political compass model. I was using the typical left-right spectrum as only a matter of simplicity, which is why i said left wing extremism can also be authoritarianism and not is always authoritarianism.
This isn’t to say that communism is always authoritarian, but it depends on the ideology of the individual and how it’s implemented.
I guess it would be better to say some authoritarian extreme left-wing ideologies are Stalinism and Maoism.
I am willing to meet in the middle and leave it at that with the principle of charity in mind. My passion comes from how broken the overton window is right now and how people conflate “liberal” and “left-wing” as being one and the same. In some contexts that’s true, but as someone who generally dislikes liberals just as much as the average conservative, I find it offensive.
This is made worse by how conservative and far-right people are often responding to real problems with liberalism (and I’m including capitalism as a liberal ideology) but end up in emotional and reactionary right-populist positions because of leftist erasure.
Editing to add: the above isn’t meant to suggest you did that, I’d categorize it as conflating authoritarianism and communism instead, but that whole political context I’m describing applies: saying leftists are the same as fascists is erasure and ignorance at best and propaganda at worst. It enables people to think that liberals are the only alternative to fascists.
Let me try to be more clear: I don’t give a shit if you continue to be ignorant, there are millions of you. I don’t owe you anything.
Now the choice to keep being uninformed is yours alone, but as a human being with the capacity for human reasoning I thought you might enjoy the opportunity to be less dumb.
Your choice is yours!
Ok bud. Have a great day