hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-28 hours agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up1691arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1673arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-28 hours agomessage-square96fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-29 hours agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.