• frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just to make a more meta comment, this is a case where cynicism is definitely not helping. We need better journalists to do this kind of deep dive without concern for losing a revenue stream. And not just in gaming hardware, either.

      If we cynically label every journalist that does it as “drama mongers”, we’re only hurting ourselves.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I haven’t been super happy about how GN approaches their journalism since they tend to sensationalize a bit, but I at least appreciate that they are pretty accurate when it comes to actual factual statements.

        His heart’s in the right place, I just don’t like the tone.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      The way they are phrasing things is very sensationalist. They are very much not doing dry, factual content. This probably is required to make a profit, but too me is still drama.

      • MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        What do you mean not doing factual content, they literally had a lawyer with them in their video about NZXT scams. They also showed tons of proof how NZXT was lying to the customers. NZXT CEO was eventually forced to do an interview regarding these news. Is it still drama to you?

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          2 days ago

          They aren’t doing dry content. They do emotional but factual content.

          • Harvey656@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hot take, who cares if it’s mildly emotional as long as it delivers the truth. The issue with sensationalism is that it usually hides the truth, lies, or tells half truths. If the facts are all right there, who care?

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            This is such a weird position to take, they’re doing investigative journalism, but you’re upset because they’re not dry and emotionless about it?

          • 9bananas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            that’s because they are forced to by the yt algorithm: you flat out cannot run a business on yt without resorting to clickbait titles, stupid thumbnails, and a bit of sensationalization, because the algorithm will deprioritize your video and unfairly limit your viewership if you don’t do those things.

            Steve’s videos are generally very much dry, factual reporting using fairly neutral language; or in other words: really decent reporting!

            if you want to complain about some tech youtuber doing the exact things you complain about, look at linus and jay…

            there’s some good reasons why steve is one of only a handful of tech channels i still subscribe to…