• PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I recognize this is a sub for hating on AI, but this is some low hanging fruit. This is just not a person familiar with organizing their thoughts and seeing the benefit of it and doesnt say shit about AI.

    • sgtgig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      40 minutes ago

      Yup. Used to do this with Reddit. I’d find a niche subreddit on some topic I was having trouble with, try and write a detailed post of what my problem was, try and include as much information as I already knew and checked, proofread it so I could ensure people understood what my problem was, and in the process something would click and I’d figure it out.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I just watched a video by a prompt a guy wrote that writes good prompts. He adds his subject to the prompt-generating prompt, then uses its output as the actual prompt.

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This and the “I asked AI …” posts are so annoying to me

    Are you really that mindless that you can’t conjure thoughts or opinions that are purely your own ?

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      That so many people have fully jumped on the “use AI for everything” train has been a disturbing thing to see. It’s clear that a large percentage of humanity doesn’t want to think, learn or use their brain for anything. I’m guessing part of that is that they’re so dumb that doing any of those things is so hard for them and they fail at even the most basic tasks that they feel AI is a godsend.
      I’ve even seen people ask others to use AI for them, which is just an astounding level of laziness and idiocy. One was right here on Lemmy, someone wanted a cutout from an image in a post, a vector image with clear black outlines of the thing they wanted, and not only could they not do it themselves, they thought no one else could, only AI, and they couldn’t even figure out how to do it via that so they asked for someone else to use AI to do it…
      I still feel whiplashed from seeing that.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If your use for AI is just rubber duck debugging, an actual rubber duck is significantly less environmentally destructive, and will still be around after OpenAI burn through all their seed capital and can no longer convince investors to keep throwing money into their trash fire.

        • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          A lot of assumptions in that post, but I agree in general. I’ve been working software for too long, and I know co-pilot or whatever it’s called that Microsoft has won’t be around in the long run.

          It’s a neat tool for now. It also isn’t complaining all the time which I like

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        One critical benefit of the rubber duck is that it doesn’t make things up.

        This is mechanically similar, I agree, but I think the rubber duck is still superior.

        And, I think this should be a “lightbulb” moment for people.

        • cadekat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          9 hours ago

          One critical benefit of the rubber duck is that it doesn’t make things up.

          You obviously haven’t seen me rubber duck debug.

        • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I disagree. The rubber duck does not propose alternatives, nor does it point out flaws.

          The flaws may be wrong, but then I have to justify it, which forces me to reconsider what I’ve written.

          It’s like having a script monkey that never took a CS class to bounce ideas off of.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I didn’t know there was a term for that. Forget debugging, in my algorithms class this is how I figured a lot of stuff out the first time too. I actually don’t know how else you’re supposed to do it. You imagine running through a loop, what specific tasks must be accomplished, and then code those tasks.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Imagine then doing this in a chatGPT prompt! Everything will go so much faster, even if you don’t press “send”!

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If this reaction were physically possible, I would have made it after reading that:

    That is a level of lack of self-awareness I haven’t seen in ages. No wonder these idiots believe AGI is right around the corner. They’re modelling it after themselves.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Well. He’s on Bluesky. Presumably doing the same thing he did on Twitter.

      edit: typo

  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Then why can’t people who’s whole personality is politics?