• Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    The brief:

    We have done nothing to stop the monopoly and now the monopoly is doing monopoly things.

    Suprised Pikatchu

    Ps.: we still wont do anything about it and just hope that the monopoly magicaly gets a competitor over night without any support or market regulation.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Imagine how much better LibreOffice would be if a fraction of what EU / European governments spent on MS Office went there. It’s your own damn fault for not fostering alternatives.

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Use open source products, and if the software creation is paid for with tax money, the source belongs to the public and should be open source too.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Well, obviously there is no direct drop-in replacement when you keep tolerating and paying billions to a monopoly 🙄

    And as long as their committment to open-source and European providers is limited to pocket change and stupid blockchain or AI initiatives this will obviously not change.

  • shameless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think its fair to be concerned.

    Microsoft offers the operating system for endpoints and a good number of servers

    They offer the office suite which I’m sure over 90% of companies use

    They offer file sharing solutions such as OneDrive and SharePoint which integrate natively with the office suite offering

    They offer the critical business services for creating accounts, managing devices, deploying software and updates, many of these features integrate natively with the operating system

    They offer security services, which again, integrate natively with the operating system.

    Its not impossible to find solutions to all of these, but finding reasonable alternatives that only work a fraction as good as some of the native features Microsoft offers, it’s understandable that there becomes a dependence on just sticking with the Microsoft option.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sharepoint is a pain to use, For sharing OneDrive does nothing better than other drives, Nextcloud offers Office integration which should cover most use cases…

      From the end user perspective, even in a business context i dont see MS to be that much better, its just people sticking with what they are used to.

      From an admin perspective i have the feeling it has gotten much worse, and whenever i had to read up on slightly administrative stuff with MS products, the documentation was terrible and things seemed needlessly complicated. Here again i have the feeling that a lot of it is a lock in effect from people just doing what they are used to and expanding on that, rather than learning anything new.

      Meanwhile one of my customers is struggling to merge their 365 accounts into one new structure after a merger. They even hired some consultants who only made things worse instead of helping with it. So everything being with Microsoft as the single provider, while running the same systems, still makes integrating the systems obnoxiously difficult.

      I’d argue the dependence on Microsoft products isn’t a result of rational business choices, but lack of qualification and knowledge meeting predatory business practices and a FOMO/technical lock-in effect.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “There are no known credible offerings from European providers,” reads an internal Commission document seen by Euractiv.

    I don’t understand what they are comparing, are they literally comparing every single feature of a trillion dollar software corporation like for like? as in are they wanting one giant like for like quick swap from office365 to like, libreoffice365? or are they saying the core features they need cannot be provided at all by european companies?

    And if this is the case, where does this leave Nextcloud?

    This is bitterly disappointing, alongside STILL not having a single EU capital market

    edit: nextcloud posted about this but didn’t say anything

    https://mastodon.xyz/@nextcloud/113859979024577130

  • erin@social.sidh.bzh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the fear is not about Windows but the online cloud service Microsoft365 and yes to offer an European alternative to that service you need shit ton of money to operate a datacenter big enough to offer services without lag or data size problem for millions of users (at least if you want to be a real concurrent to Microsoft365).

    on a smaller size, there is Nextcloud in the Open Source space that integrate a lot of tools that Microsoft365 has… So a good start exist for a more privacy solution, but that’s on you Brussel to create full time jobs to makes open source MR/PR to improve the scalability and the feature of Nextcloud while staying true to the open source spirit…

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We should be worried about Windows as well to be completely honest. But at the very least, it’s still more replaceable.

      Nextcloud is a great start point, but it’s terribly underfunded… as are all of our “alternatives” to big tech companies.