• Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Again, that may be the case, but it’s still not good for people to lose their jobs in the first place.

    Especially not in this economy.

    • Lexi Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope every unethical company goes over and everyone who works at all of them remains unemployed for at least 3 months actually. Unethical companies = employees often complacent and part of the problem.

      I don’t see why you want to defend this

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not defending the company or the actions of whoever is involved in misconduct. But I also don’t believe in guilt by association.

        Sorry for caring about people’s livelihoods.

        • Lexi Sneptaur
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It isn’t guilt by association. It’s not caring about several people losing their jobs as a result of their employer’s decision to sexually harass women. The few jobs lost isn’t that big of a deal compared to the trauma the female employees were put through. Those people will have no problem finding new work.