• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just want to know how these figures would change in case women were to change their behavior and start going out for late night walks.

    I think part of the reason we see these numbers instead is due to women’s apprehensivess in the first place, but I could be wrong.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean the honest reaction is if someone wants to stay home to not get murdered. Fine, I couldn’t care less and it’s stupid for me to have an opinion on that, you live your life.

      But it’s a sort of catch 22 that you’ll only go outside if you can be sure the figures won’t change significantly and the only way to see if the figures change is to try going outside.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hard to say. I see women out walking alone at night all the time in my city, at least a handful just past my house every evening. (It’s a university town.) I passed one woman happily chatting on her phone, and oblivious to the world, while riding home tonight after dark. The last time anyone was attacked by a stranger was, I dunno? It definitely happens, but it’s years between instances. They’d probably be safer in the late night hours, with hardly any car traffic. A lot more people get killed by cars.