What’s great about this, and Stephen Fry is brilliant, is not that he’s absolving Musk, or that he’s criticizing Tesla, but that it is an argument likely leading to Elon Musk protesting,

‘No, my cars are good enough that I can be a Nazi!’

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think he’s trying to excuse it. I think he’s saying you’d view an autistic Nazi walmart greeter more differently than you’d view an autistic Nazi whose already the wealthiest man in the world, and society’s values are letting that wealth have a huge platform and allowing him to basically run the country unilaterally.

      An autistic Nazi plebian doesn’t have that kind of influence. Many people would probably pity them. An autistic Nazi being given the world is probably a bad thing.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah I guess we’re not allowed to talk about this guy clinically at all. Has to be about good vs evil.

      • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You want to argue that armchair psychology is more important in this situation than condemning doing a Nazi salute?

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Armchair psychology and armchair political rants are both armchair activities., so neither is more important, and they can both happen at the same time.

          It’s just interesting that all statements about <bad guy du jour> are considered support if they aren’t condemnation. If you said Bill Cosby used to do funny standup for example, you would be flooded with hate because the only acceptable reason to mention Cosby is condemn him for being horrible. But understanding the psychology of horrible people is actually important. Think how it would be if you got a rectal disease and it turned out there was no cure because assholes are gross so nobody studies them and anybody who mentions them except to rant about how disgusting they are gets pounded with douchevotes and called a pervert. Objective talk about aspects of sociopaths should be okay. Don’t be the Christian who clutches their rosary every time somebody says “Satan”.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          I think extreme wealth is a matter of luck. Lots of equally clever, equally hardworking people succeed moderately, but extreme wealth and success are a perfect storm of timing, economics, and a lot of other things that nobody controls.