• Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    This comic misses the incentive for local businesses to chase the new profit margin created by the tariff.

    If your competition is import goods, you may sell a quality product at $2, with the import version at $1.50. If the tariff causes the import to rise to $2.50, then the local capitalist will raise to $2.40. There’s no reason not to take the extra profit made from a selfish perspective.

    Alternatively, the importer could leave the market. But now you have a monopoly, which again, is anti-competitive and leads to raised prices and malicious practices without consumer protections, which the administration seems to be firing.

    These are great moves for capital owners to reshape and control market. Consumers will suffer.

    • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This implies that local availability of competitive products exists, which for the vast majority of things in the US is not the case. So many of our goods are made overseas and imported.

      Tariffs are going to raise consumer expenses till one of two things happens: Local production ramps up and provides local goods (at likely a similar or higher price because our wages are higher than overseas) or a political change occurs that results in the removal of the tariffs. Either way US consumers are going to feel the increased cost of goods for the foreseeable future…

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        And meanwhile many small businesses will go down since they don’t have the bargaining power like their bigger competitors. The rising prices of their suppliers will completely wipe out the tiny margins they had. Even if they raise their prices their competitors can undercut them even more aggressively now. Also quality and quantities will go down.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Hypothetically this could create business incentives for building local capacity, but realistically manufacturers are not going to invest with the assumption that these tariffs will be permanent. Eventually either Trump will back down or he’ll be replaced by someone else, and the tariffs will end. Why invest in manufacturing when there’s no long term guarantees for profitability?

      • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Agreed that the typical, more realistic case is what will happen.

        I’ve gotten into arguments with other keyboard warriors over this point, so it’s something I mention when tariffs are discussed.