Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
I donāt know what āwhole language learningā is, and Iām way too young to have experience it, but wasnāt the curriculum before ānew mathā like arithmetic and nothing else? In other words, not math at all?
I didnāt read much into it but from what I did it seems like they started teaching children actual math like algebra and logic and parents got frustrated because they were too stupid to help with homework anymore. Brings into my mind the whole āmath was cool before they involved lettersā thing that makes me want to throw a book at someone.
New response from scratch because I manically edited the shit out of my old one. Sorry for linking the wikipedia page there ā you were clearly referring to the same thing I was and I didnāt take the appropriate time to understand your reply. I apologize.
The backlash I am familiar with is that students would learn how to identify the place value of something (āthe
3in220134āhas value3 * 5Ā¹ā) but not be able to do actual arithmetic (3 * 5 = ?). Basically āwhy are my kids learning this abstract stuff about numerals or set theory when they canāt even remember their times tables?ā That is my primary issue with it ā it is not good pedagogy. Abstraction should come after a student has learned the foundational material. They arenāt professional mathematicians, and treating them as such (beginning with abstract definitions, as we do) is bad pedagogy.I am sure there was some pushback in the form of āthis is too hardā, but I donāt know how much of that kind of pushback occurred. I also would not necessarily blame it on the intelligence of parents. I can imagine a sort of shellshock when your 10 year old comes home with abstract mathematics that you never learned or only learned in high school or at the undergraduate level. And I can similarly understand the outrage when you expect your child to learn foundational skills in school, only for those to be skipped in favor of a high-minded appeal to āreal understandingā (in my experience, this is a theme in US education ā donāt memorize basic arithmetic because you can just consult your calculator; donāt memorize facts because you can just look them up).
I do not know what the curriculum was before new math, but I would be very surprised if they exclusively taught arithmetic in all of K-12 before the 1950s. I havenāt confirmed this, though.
I do think it is good pedagogy to pepper in motivations for abstract concepts early. Have a student evaluate
1723 * 16via the standard algorithm and separately have them performtl;dr I think it was more āwhy are my kids learning this shit before they learn to multiplyā than āI have no idea how to help my kid with their homework.ā Anecdotally, the latter is not something I have experienced (when I taught K-12), even when the material was abstract and something the parents couldnāt help with.
deleted by creator