The paper is here
Thanks to @KoboldCoterie@pawb.social for highlighting this bit:
Then there were “super-emitters” with extremely high overall greenhouse gas emissions, corresponding to about the top 0.1 percent of households. About 15 days of emissions from a super-emitter was equal to a lifetime of emissions for someone in the poorest 10 percent in America.
The important context missing from the title.
I mean, yeah… people with more money will have more investments and business assets, and therefore will have a higher contribution, this probably didn’t need a study to determine. The more interesting / shocking statistic, in my opinion, is:
This is absolutely disgusting, and unconscionable.
It’s why you see people recommending 'eat the rich as having a lower climate impact than a vegan diet.
Reminds me of how I threw out more in one shift in fast food than my household did in a month.
Your total trash footprint is higher than someone who lives in a mega-mansion but has a full-time housekeeper. They in fact have no trash footprint, since they never take out trash. You should be ashamed.
Thank you for this context. It’s really affects the messaging here