• buedi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, they had the better technology (Google Video was very bad) and Google had the money.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What was bad about Google Video? That was my favourite of the two: nice UI, clean, good recommendations

      • buedi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing that stuck with me was that I always had the impression that the Video quality was much worse than on Youtube. IIRC when there was content that was available on both platforms, Youtube had the much better picture and sound. But maybe that was just specific to the content I watched back then. There was not THAT much to see in the beginning, not like today where you can spend 24h straight and always see new stuff :-)

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could be, on my connection back then the quality difference was probably unnoticeable. I remember having to wait for buffering every time I played a video on a website.