• Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Nuclear is reliable, predictable and stable 24/7 source. Solar not so much and possibly not that great for the environment if we don’t figure out what to do with used solar panels. Also their production is not exactly clean. Whereas nuclear requires a wasted fuel storage somewhere and the fuel will eventually run out of radiation in some hundreds of thousands years.

    • Schorsch@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Storing something extremely dangerous extremely safely for “some hundreds of thousands of years” doesn’t exactly sound cheap, does it?

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Not that expensive either. And that’s already included in the energy price. Also volume is magnitudes smaller than used solar panels.