• Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I think he’s doing awesome. Closing down the dept of education isn’t going to magically and suddenly make kids ignorant. You realize that he’s not closing schools, right?

    • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not magically or suddenly, but deliberately and surely. Do you really think this is about saving money? Wtf do musk and trump care about government efficiency?

      • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Not magically or suddenly, but deliberately and surely.

        Where? Do you have a list of schools that are being shut down as a result of this?

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          ^ This is the level of reading comprehension we can expect even more students to have after finishing school after this

        • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I didn’t say schools were being shut down. I said that it will result in children being increasingly ignorant. Why do you think that they are shutting down the agency that regulates schools, to save chump change?

          • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I said that it will result in children being increasingly ignorant.

            How so? What are some examples of children becoming increasingly ignorant?

            • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 minutes ago

              There would be less funding for schools, especially low income, special education, and rural. Less funding means more uneducated children. That is one example, but the DOE manages grants and loans, oversees civil rights and access, and national education standards and data. These are things that increase education accessibility and quality.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Meanwhile they’re drafting an almost 5 trillion dollar tax giveaway for the richest people in the country.

            Real money saving group they are.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s almost like they were responding to the other bullshit claim you made.

          And your attempt to misdirect is just pathetifc. Do you think people can’t read what you yourself wrote one comment above?

      • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Without it, certain states can and will say “well this rural town doesn’t really need kids to go to school, they can become factory workers instead.”

        Any news articles that show that schools are closing because the Department of Education is being DOGE’d?

          • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So if it hasn’t happened, what proof do you have that it will? Why bring it up if it hasn’t happened, and there is no proof that it will happen?

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              It’s called being able to follow logical consequences.

              Removing rules that the worst run state education departments have already been trying to bypass, won’t make those school less bad.

              • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It’s called being able to follow logical consequences.

                The news article doesn’t say that.

                • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Why would Breitbart, a well known right wing propoganda rag, ever tell you the actual very obviously bad consequences of the actions of right wing politicians’ actions?

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Not that I expect someone like you will care about the actual details but he’s only just done it so it’s going to take time for the effects to be felt. This might go over your head but government agencies are huge and complicated entities and when you rip out the heart it takes a while for the limbs to die. The states with robust economies like California, Texas, Illinois, and New York will be fine but poor states like Arkansas, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi will be seeing school closings before the end of 2025 of this isn’t stopped.

          • Hazel Stone@lemmy.wtfOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Not that I expect someone like you will care about the actual details but he’s only just done it so it’s going to take time for the effects to be felt.

            So you have no proof. Just predictions. This is a news article, not a prophesy piece.