• BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes, both things that you said are apparent at surface value, and i can also see that.

      What message is it trying to convey that is not supposed to be apparent?

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        It really is that simple, and it’s a foundational tenet of post-modernist art, recognizing and emphasizing the distinction between images and the reality they depict:

        (Fun Fact; Fascists hate modernism and post-modernism for this reason. Their ideology idolizes certain images and aesthetics as being representative of a greater truth and seeks to reify them by forcing reality to align with their preconceptions. Acknowledging that what we see isn’t the nature of the thing being seen (or in the modernist sense, that there is more than one valid perspective on any subject) would mean admitting that the golden age of the past that they seek to return to is also just an image and not reality. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/architectural-styles/a2941-the-rejection-of-modern-art-as-a-form-of-fascism/ )

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Fascists hate modernism and post-modernism for this reason.

          They might not like the art, but with the post-truth blatancy fascism has definitely embraced a core aspect of post modernism lately. It’s not pretty nor clever.