• lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Two sides of the same coin, since all “regular” conservatives are also “far-right” extremists. Any “moderate conservative” is just a centrist Democrat at this point.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except no. The majority of “moderate conservatives” would still vote for the Republican candidate. 74 million Americans voted for Trump in 2020.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And those 74 million people are far-right extremists and in no way “Moderate.”

          That’s the point. That’s the Overton Window.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was with you until that line. I know too many people who voted for Trump because they were ignorant and detached from politics, not because they were alt-right.

            There is a difference. Many of those detached-from-politics people are seeing Trump face all those charges, and moving on. Some are being told that it’s part of some Democratic conspiracy against Trump. If you’ve ever traveled to a red state on business and seen the local news, you’d understand how easy it is for someone to get convinced of the lie even though they are more aligned with Democrats on the issues than Republicans.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m torn on how to respond to this. On one hand, I grew up in rural Appalachia in a Republican household. Eventually my family pivoted 180 towards Democrats and never looked back. I shudder to wonder if we would’ve been the idyllic Trump supporter 20-years-ago. I know what it’s like when Fox News is blaring in every doctor’s lobby, every bar, etc. When on the job site every other person is espousing those same conservative views. So I recognize that people are capable of change and we should not give up entirely on them (though their vote is less needed these days).

              The thing is, many voted for Hitler not out of dyed-in-the-wool SS Nazi beliefs, but as you said: Complete ignorance.

              Most of the people who voted for Trump knew what he was for and agreed with his platform. That platform was far-right. In the end, I don’t find much difference between those so incredibly gullible (useful idiots?) enough to fall for the shallow fox news propaganda of far-right extremism, versus those who know the game and commit 100% — both lead to the same dangerous logical conclusion. Besides, I think every far-right extremist at their core is ignorant in themselves.

              • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most of the people who voted for Trump knew what he was for and agreed with his platform. That platform was far-right

                I can’t speak for everyone. But I knew quite a few Trump voters who clearly did not understand the for-right platform. They thought they voted:

                1. Anti-corruption
                2. This idea that both parties are the same and here’s someone who actually wants to pull a Perot
                3. Saving jobs (he actually dramatically overperformed the labor vote that, while they can be racist, don’t usually run towards the dogwhistle candidate)

                This, to me, is similar to a lot of the folks voting for Obama thinking he was actually progressive despite openly being conservative.

                In the end, I don’t find much difference between those so incredibly gullible (useful idiots?) enough to fall for the shallow fox news propaganda of far-right extremism

                There is a drastic difference between evil people and stupid people, and knowing that is both important for keeping your sanity in a country that elected him, but also politically important for knowing that we’re not just a few votes away from the majority of Americans wanting a fascism.

                both lead to the same dangerous logical conclusion

                This is true, and why it’s both important that we educate people, and that we work towards a country where campaigns of lies are either illegal or at least made ineffective. The Democrats ran fairly hard on “everything Trump said is a lie” and were able to prove it, and that wasn’t enough.

                Besides, I think every far-right extremist at their core is ignorant in themselves.

                Sure, but not every fool is a racist. Most of them are “centirsts” or merely uninterested in politics and just want to go on with their lives.

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A lot of Americans are certainly being duped by right-wing propaganda. Distinguishing between the right-wing propaganda that dominates the airwaves and what is actually right-wing are two different things, which I think you fairly note. There are many people, including members of my extended family and many others who I’d consider generally “good” people, but duped and led astray — no doubt. I too have met these same people who cited the same points you did. But man, at this point if they haven’t changed, I have very little hope that they ever will. These aren’t centrists; these are largely red-hats through and through.

                  Like I said, this is how fascism rises to power. it hinges on the gullible and ignorant, not as I said the dyed-in-the-wool believers. They Thought They Were Free is a great book that examines this. That 1940s, “Don’t be a Sucker” video illustrated this well, too.

                  I think it’s reasonable to say that Obama was a progressive at heart, but conservative because a large swath of the country leans conservative, no thanks to right-wing talk radio, the influence of church, and Fox News (we can discuss modern influences like Russia’s foreign influence operation, Bannon & Breitbart, Joe Rogan, etc. and their effect today of course). The thing is, people believe right-wing talking points: (a) unions bad, (b) the rich earned it, © immigrants are bad, etc. Meanwhile many people publicly espouse “moderate” views but if among trusted acquaintances on a back patio, they show their true colors. So while I still to this day believe Obama is a progressive at heart, he felt one could not force too rapid of progress for a country still skewed to the right. I find that slightly different than those who were outright duped by thinking Trump was some sort of leader of blue collar worker when anyone with a brain could see from history he was anything but.

                  There is a drastic difference between evil people and stupid people, and knowing that is both important for keeping your sanity in a country that elected him, but also politically important for knowing that we’re not just a few votes away from the majority of Americans wanting a fascism.

                  I think there’s somewhat of a difference as to origin of beliefs, but I don’t know if there’s much in the outcome or even the capacity to move these people. I’d be more likely to fully buy that argument if this was still midway through Trump’s first term. For instance, after all has been said and done by Trump over the years. Scandal after scandal. Lie after lie. From grabbing women by the pussy, racist comments toward Mexico, Trump University fraud, or even the very first lie of his Presidency: the size of his inauguration… To catastrophic response to COVID, the damning 2 impeachments and even more compelling 91 criminal charges across 4 Grand Jury indictments… All of this is public record. All these losers know what Trump is, and yet they still continue to vote for him. Don’t count on a large number of them simply being innocently gullible. At what point do you simply conclude, “They just don’t care, do they?”

                  After all, even after showing his true colors and saturating the national media spotlight for 4 years, he came away with 11 million more votes. If people are that ignorant, then I regret to think there’s little hope for the vast majority of them and they are just as complicit in the outcome. Willful ignorance at best. Still, so incredibly dangerous. And after nearly 8 years of trying to get through to these people how bad Trump is, how much progress have we actually made among those who already fell for the cult?

                  Here’s where I hope we can find common ground: Every year there is a new batch of citizens who enter the political fold for one reason or another — whether that’s coming of age and finally taking an interest in civics, or someone who has had some major issue personally impact them. Generally there are a lot of the middle-ground “enlightened centrist,” fence-sitters who have yet to fully commit to a side. These are the people we must reach out to. They’re the ones not too far gone and too isolated among right-wing echo-chambers to catch before they’re gone (great allegory for this in The Matrix / Plato’s Cave). As we’re pursuing these fence-sitters, we must also energize the left by actually committing to progressive policy that we know works. Time and again, we shoot ourselves in the foot by trying to water down our policies in order to appeal to voters whom we’ll never get on the right anyway — only to disenfranchise the most active part of the left and water down our policies to such an extent that it backfires when implemented.

                  • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I agree with quite a few of your points, but not all of them. The biggest disagreement we have is on the nature of Obama.

                    In his political career, he was always a conservative/moderate. The fact that he seemed to hide his conservativeness in his campaigning suggests he knew progressives might be a fair draw and he needed their vote. Maybe he’s a lifestyle liar, but I wouldn’t bet on it.

                    As for Trump voters. Yeah. Two counterpoints.

                    1. Undecided voters are often short-sighted. Hell, most voters are short-sighted. We don’t remember 6 months ago if we’re not repeatedly reminded.
                    2. Buttery males, Bernie the commie, Hunter’s laptop. Birth Certificate. To someone distanced, the scandals started around 2007 and hasn’t stopped since. It takes actually paying attention to the scandals to realize that they’re not all fake. This is one of the neocon strategies: desensitize us to the evils they cannot hide.

                    Generally there are a lot of the middle-ground “enlightened centrist,” fence-sitters who have yet to fully commit to a side. These are the people we must reach out to.

                    1000% agree. But it’s not easy. I look at some of my family members in their formative voting years (19-22). They are uninterested in the left… why? Because they have family who won’t shut up about how bad Trump is. I kid you not. They have analyzed enough to realize it’s true, but then found themselves just not caring to vote because some people are just so damn passionate. Like passion is a bad thing. And it’s not just one or two people. The attitude seems fairly common, and reiterates the “desensitize” thing. The real problem could well be that after this influx of gen y upping the vote out of fear of Trump, we’re going to watch the voting rate plummet again… and we all know what happens when not enough people vote.

          • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            When they vote for, and are ok with open arms for far right extreme shit, what should it be called?

            I know some people might seem to be normal and perhaps moderate, but when you sit down with them and explain some of this shit to them, and they basically are ok with it because they feel the bad shit will only impact other people and not themselves (for example religious persecution - “I’m Christian so I’ll be fine”) what does one call that?

            • S_204@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              One calls that bigotry because that’s exactly what it is. They’re bigots and prejudicial against other religions and I’d wager races as well.

        • Mockrenocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not a moderate if you support overthrowing the government. They can delude themselves, but they should absolutely be denied that label.