pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 天前nuked from orbitmander.xyzimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down111cross-posted to: murderedbywords@feddit.ukscience_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1389arrow-down1imagenuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 天前message-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: murderedbywords@feddit.ukscience_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-215 小时前It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-214 小时前It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 小时前Sure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
Sure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.