Nemeski@lemm.ee to Firefox@lemmy.world · 1 day agoMozilla’s approach to Manifest V3: What’s different and why it matters for extension usersblog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down10cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkMozilla’s approach to Manifest V3: What’s different and why it matters for extension usersblog.mozilla.orgNemeski@lemm.ee to Firefox@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoIts nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.
minus-squareFlagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoI’ve already been on Waterfox for years, personally.
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agowaterfox does not use manifest?
minus-squareFlagstaff@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoI don’t understand; are you asking a question?
minus-squareHubertManne@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoyeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.
Its nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.
I’ve already been on Waterfox for years, personally.
waterfox does not use manifest?
I don’t understand; are you asking a question?
yeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.