return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 days agoShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1568arrow-down13
arrow-up1565arrow-down1external-linkShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThey certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
minus-squarespooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 days ago They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured. You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 days agoYes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.
They certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
Yes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.