European New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) — an independent and well-regarded safety body for the automotive industry — is set to introduce new rules in January 2026 that require the vehicles it assesses to have physical controls to receive a full five-star safety rating.

While Euro NCAP testing is voluntary, it is widely backed by several EU governments with companies like Tesla, Volvo, VW, and BMW using their five-star scores to boast about the safety of their vehicles to potential buyers.

“The overuse of touchscreens is an industry-wide problem, with almost every vehicle-maker moving key controls onto central touchscreens, obliging drivers to take their eyes off the road and raising the risk of distraction crashes,” said Matthew Avery, director of strategic development at Euro NCAP, to the Times. To be eligible for the maximum safety rating after the new testing guidelines go into effect, cars will need to use buttons, dials, or stalks for hazard warning lights, indicators, windscreen wipers, SOS calls, and the horn.

The Euro NCAP’s safety guidelines aren’t a legal requirement, however, car makers take safety ratings pretty seriously, so any risk of points being docked during such assessments is likely to be taken into consideration.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m actually a fan of big screens, HOWEVER they should be limited to being an actual “infotainment” system only. All essential controls should be buttons, switches, and dials.

    • Chulk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My vote is:

      1. Button layouts that have worked for 20-30 years
      2. Heads-up displays for readouts of current values. Mph/kmph is displayed by default and the display temporarily changes when something like volume, heat, radio station, track, etc. is adjusted

      Best of both worlds

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I disagree. I don’t want to have to take my eyes off the road to change my music, or turn the volume up/down. They need to be physical buttons/knobs.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think I agree. I would be fine with an infotainment system that:

      1. doesn’t cripple the car when broken
      2. isn’t integrated with non-screen controls like climate
      3. still has functional buttons on the steering wheel

      My malibu meets 2 and 3, but the fact that if the infotainment system breaks it cripples the entire car, puts me on edge. This would be mitigated if actual functionality was outside of it, and that the touch screen was just a control layer.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There should be two screens. One only visible from the navigators seat and always available. The other can be where it makes sense, but it should be disabled for all input when the car is not in park. When the car is in motion only limited information is allowed - you shouldn’t be able to tell what the name of the song playing is as that isn’t something you have any business reading. You should get some indication of what the next turn is, but even that needs serious UX work to ensure it is not distracting.