• severien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The obvious choice would’ve been to not use it and state the numbers plainly.

    How would you write it?

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The open source Git project just released Git 2.42 with features and bug fixes from 78 contributors, 17 of them new.

      There. Simple.

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there were more contributors, you just don’t know how many. By this you’re kind of disregard their work.

        • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          No there aren’t, stop making things up. From the official release notes:

          The latest feature release Git v2.42.0 is now available at the
          usual places.  It is comprised of 453 non-merge commits since
          v2.41.0, contributed by 78 people, 17 of which are new faces
          
          • severien@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            78 people contributed in the form of code commits, but more people likely contributed to the release in other ways (QA, triage, release management etc.)

            • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fuck me. Can you not read? It is stating specifically features and bug fixes. QA, triage, release management are neither features nor bug fixes. They’re processes. They’re necessary. But that’s a separate thing.