• SoupBrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think I am for this use of AI. Specifically for image moderation, not really community moderation. Yes, it would be subject to whatever bias they want, but they already moderate with a bias.

    If they could create this technology, situations like the linked article could be avoided: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/22/business/facebook-content-moderators-kenya-ptsd-intl/index.html

    Edit: To be clear, not to replace existing reddit mods, but to be a supplemental tool.

    • Lumberjacked@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I agree. AI could be good for first line of defense specifically for sorting our traumatizing gore and the like.

      For normal moderation I think it’s only useful in the same way as spell check. Second set or eyes but human makes the final call.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hotdog / Not Hotdog

      But yeah, having a semantical image filter could do be a good first line, of course with human oversight.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      And frankly, seeing the mod abuse that goes on in many communities, having AI moderators helping with text moderation would be nice too. At least they’d be more consistent.