diskmaster23@lemmy.one to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBoomers had it easier.lemmy.oneimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down18
arrow-up1411arrow-down1imageBoomers had it easier.lemmy.onediskmaster23@lemmy.one to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoFyi A full time job is 2080 hrs a year (40hrs/wk x 52 weeks).
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoJust use 2000 hours. It makes the math easier, plus anybody who doesn’t get (at least!) two weeks of vacation with their full-time job is a chump who needs to unionize anyway.
minus-squareBarqsHasBite@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoVacation, stat holidays, sick days, we can keep adding it all. I’m going to stick to 2080.
minus-squareCannacheques@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNot hard to pull off if the economy gets better
minus-squareAllonzeeLV@vlemmy.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoKeep kicking at that football, Charlie
Fyi A full time job is 2080 hrs a year (40hrs/wk x 52 weeks).
Just use 2000 hours. It makes the math easier, plus anybody who doesn’t get (at least!) two weeks of vacation with their full-time job is a chump who needs to unionize anyway.
Vacation, stat holidays, sick days, we can keep adding it all. I’m going to stick to 2080.
Not hard to pull off if the economy gets better
Keep kicking at that football, Charlie