Pseudo-legaleese FUD is not necessarily intended to be used in court (where commonly it would not have a chance).
This is another instance of .world trying to deflect critisism for their choices by invoking “the law”. Last time they claimed to have consulted a lawyer.
The problem is not that they can actually “enforce their tos” nor that they can ban you. Its that they try to steer Lemmy as a platform to their preferred directio, this time apparently against teen users, using false pretenses.
Pseudo-legaleese FUD is not necessarily intended to be used in court (where commonly it would not have a chance).
This is another instance of .world trying to deflect critisism for their choices by invoking “the law”. Last time they claimed to have consulted a lawyer.
The problem is not that they can actually “enforce their tos” nor that they can ban you. Its that they try to steer Lemmy as a platform to their preferred directio, this time apparently against teen users, using false pretenses.