What do you guys think?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s directly in the rules of the sidebar, and you violated them. Lemmy isn’t an unmoderated space. It’s a space where you can engage where you pick the moderation style you’re interested in. What you experienced wasn’t censorship, it was the repercussions of your own actions

    • KoboldCoterie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I did something pointlessly mean and insensitive, but that’s not important! I experienced repercussions that I feel were undeserved! I demand justice (but only for me, not for anyone else)!”

      I get what you’re trying to say, but you’re choosing a rather tactless way to say it. Point is, that community is run by moderators who are exercising their right to ban you based on your choice of speech. You could send the moderators of the community a DM, apologize, and try to sort it out, but instead you’re coming here to complain, which is… definitely not going to solve the problem.

      Alternately, start your own AskLemmy community elsewhere. If enough people disagree with those moderator decisions, they can come and participate in yours, instead. That, really, is the benefit of Lemmy over Reddit.

    • Jamie@jamie.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, being vulgar and flaming people is just sorta proving the point of why you got banned, if anything. I wouldn’t really say you’re making a good case for yourself here.

    • Kettlepants@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get you’re coming at this from a free speech angle, but yeah, I don’t think flaming is helpful. With more users, and more experienced mods, I think this issue will reduce and you’ll be able to offend more people with less pushback 😂

        • racemaniac@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re calling someone a retard, but the point isn’t specifically to offend people?

          Maybe it’s time for you to learn that it’s not your intentions that count, but your actions. And your action in this case is definitely offending someone because they don’t agree with you.

          The proper response would be to just say why, in your opinion, both sides are the same isn’t the case, and why you think it’s a bad take on the situation.

          • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m the offending commenter, the “victim” of @Antik’s antics. I certainly took no personal offense to a stranger calling me a silly name on the internet, but I do agree that such actions should not be normalized, simply because ad hominem attacks add nothing to a conversation and only serve to derail what could otherwise be a healthy discussion.

            So, @Antik, I don’t agree that you should’ve been banned, but you clearly showed an unwillingness to have an honest, open discussion, and that is most likely why you were hit with the banhammer.

        • animist@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your edit only proves even more that you have worms for brains

          Also this instance doesn’t have downvotes. it’s just nobody is upvoting you at all

              • YuzuDrink@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Is here on Beehaw get the features enabled on Beehaw, regardless if the poster’s instance has ones not enabled here. So you wouldn’t get downvotes over on here. But lemmy.ml has then it seems. You may even have downvotes over there that you wouldn’t know about here! Fedi is weird sometimes…

                • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’re on Lemmy.one which also doesn’t do down votes. But all around, good description of how a federated voting system can be odd

    • ritswd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think in that mod’s head, it was the point.

      I mean no disrespect, but your comments come across as you having some anger management issues. I can see how someone could worry that it might be to the point of being ready to take everything down with you.

      I would say that the use of needlessly aggressive language is a part of it. I don’t particularly associate it with free speech (assuming that you do) since it doesn’t relate to an opinion you’re expressing with it; but it would occur to me as a mod that this anger could be a threat to keeping the community healthy for longer. The pointlessly aggressive comments is something that I personally don’t miss from Reddit.

      Anyway, Lemmy is decentralized, so you’re free to start your own instance/community who may be joined by other like-minded users who may not read into it what I’m reading into it. I don’t know you, and I could be wrong.

    • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You got band for being an asshole on an instance that doesn’t allow assholes. I’m not really seeing the parallel.

          • Klicnik@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You have made an assumption on the poster, and then called him out over your assumption. If you think trumpers need to be called out, why not wait for him to say something about Trump? If you have a legitimate criticism of what he has said in this discussion, why not bring that up?

            I assume you are a racist, and that makes me angry. How could you? /s