• bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting that the wealth bar of the 400 richest Americans is about 6-times as long as the author needs to say some interesting points.

    • Darukhnarn@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d argue that’s another good argument for seizing their assets and making them pay for their asshole behaviour.

      • CIWS-30@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, probably the only way to save the Environment and Democracy. Too much power in the hands of the few leads to perpetual effective monarchy. It’s why the Founding Fathers were against large amounts of inherited wealth, particularly inherited wealth that creates dynasties in perpetuity.

        I know people don’t like the Founding Fathers that much lately, and I see why, but conservatives really don’t understand them, and deliberately misrepresent them, because not doing so would undercut all conservative “policies”.

        World’s a mess because of inequality and the concentration of almost all wealth and power into the hands of a small amount of sociopaths. I honestly think the only way to solve this permanently is to cap the amount of wealth and power any individual or family can have.

        • Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m actually ok with wealthy people being wealthy, but when they took over the government as a way to make even more money at our expense is where I draw the line. We need to take back regulatory power, it’s the only thing that can compete at today’s scale.