The NIH has been accused of funding dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Legislation is being proposed to ban federal funding for this research, which many powerful individuals have alleged is what led to the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, many scientists have pointed out that the vague language of the legislation would result in a blanket ban of federal funding for any virology or vaccine research in the U.S. This would mean that vaccine production and roll out would become completely privatized, even in the event of a pandemic.
This post examines the current policy behind federal funding for GOF research, which is based on framework created nearly a year into Donald Trump’s first term.
The framework was created in response to policy recommendations provided by the Obama administration for oversight and care of pathogens with pandemic potential (P3CO). However, while P3CO provided recommendations for oversight and public transparency, these recommendations seem to have been omitted from the Trump framework for federal funding.
Justification for the removal of federal funding frequently sites a lack of oversight and transparency by the NIH. However, there is never any explanation given for why the Trump framework failed to include the recommendations to enable oversight and transparency for funding decisions.
Two days after taking office for his second term, Trump proposed an executive order banning GOF research, and received public praise from the Heritage Foundation.
This post which is focused on the policy background, will be followed by additional posts examining the proposed legislation and vaccine privatization.
I think you might have forgotten to link the article?
Not a good look making claims without sources in an anti-disinformation community. Just sayin’.
You’re absolutely right. Sorry about that. Just updated it.
I think they forgot to link the article? Let’s see if it gets added in.
Sorry about that not sure why it didn’t attach. I just updated it