fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours agoLeast extreme biophysics phdlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageLeast extreme biophysics phdlemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·edit-215 hours agoA quick trip on Google scholar turns up a lot of studies on the size of male erections. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/553598c1e4b0a7f854584291/t/55ee4a5ee4b025d99f73150e/1441679966732/Penis+Size+Study+-+Veale+et+al+2015+BJUI.pdf It is acknowledged that some of the volunteers across different studies may have taken part in a study because they were more confident with their penis size than the general male population. Ha, poisoned data tho
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoSure, they exist, but they have the flaws outlined above.
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 hours agoOf course it was biased, those numbers are huge on there, it was men confident in their size skewing the data, at least that’s what I will tell myself
A quick trip on Google scholar turns up a lot of studies on the size of male erections.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/553598c1e4b0a7f854584291/t/55ee4a5ee4b025d99f73150e/1441679966732/Penis+Size+Study+-+Veale+et+al+2015+BJUI.pdf
Ha, poisoned data tho
Sure, they exist, but they have the flaws outlined above.
Of course it was biased, those numbers are huge on there, it was men confident in their size skewing the data, at least that’s what I will tell myself