• Ferus42@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Could that be because he’s had fewer issues with Windows and hasn’t had a need to troubleshoot it?

    Windows 11 is a shitty version of Windows, but it’s not Windows ME or Vista. It sucks because of the arbitrary CPU and TPM requirements, plus having AI forced into a user’s desktop. Not to mention Microsoft is dragging its feet fixing performance issues in Explorer.

    It’s still very stable on good hardware with stable drivers. Point out the actual shit parts of Windows, not lazy callbacks to the days of Windows 98.

    • Alaknár@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Could that be because he’s had fewer issues with Windows and hasn’t had a need to troubleshoot it?

      It’s actually the opposite. Worked in IT for 20 years, had to troubleshoot every conceivable issue with Windows.

      Here’s the difference: 90% of the time, once you’ve installed the OS, it’s smooth sailing*. If it’s not, reboot, and it will be fine. For the fringe cases, just search online to find help.

      This last bit is what kills Linux as “user-friendly OS” - you have one distro, but solutions you find are for five different distros and each one looks and feels slightly differently, so things are in different places.

      EDIT:

      * I should’ve added: TODAY. It used to be VERY different, but these days? It’s mostly “fire and forget”.

      • Ferus42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ve also spent my fair share of time in IT. I can’t recall any common issue with the reliability of Windows in the enterprise. Single user issues that originally appeared to be an OS problem later turned out to be caused by hardware. Usually hard disks, though I did find a bad stick of RAM once.

        The vast majority of issues I typically saw were application related, usually industry specific software. What I did come to hate was industry applications written to run on the Java Runtime environment. Especially when a user needed several different apps which were not all compatible with a common JRE version. There’s DLL hell, dependency hell, and then there’s JRE hell.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      2080 ti and 128gb of ram - it is definitely not stable and unlike Linux isn’t ready out of the box

      • Ferus42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So you can afford 128GB of ram, a motherboard that can support that, a processor that can address that… and you’re running a 2080ti?

        It’s such an odd configuration I wouldn’t be surprised if the Nvidia driver were causing the issue. Contrary to the concept of a “unified driver,” the code for your GPU probably hasn’t been touched by nvidia in a while. Either that, or maybe you’ve got all that hardware, but you’re running Windows 8 or something else odd.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 minutes ago

          W10/11

          And yes the gpu needs an upgrade, but I don’t have a server in need of it yet so it stays in my personal computer

          And on Linux it handles everything I need

          • Ferus42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            I am not going to troubleshoot this via Lemmy, but it does sound interesting. The fact that you specifically mention the combination of your GPU plus the 128GB of RAM still suggests to me that it’s a hardware or driver issue.

            Windows has supported 128GB of RAM since Windows XP x64 Edition.

      • Alaknár@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You seem to be confused. We’re talking about an “OS for the masses”. What you’re talking about is so far beyond the “high end for the top tier enthusiasts” that it’s not even funny.

          • Alaknár@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D

            To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Did you even read what I said?

              If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that

              • Alaknár@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                What are you trying to argue here, mate?

                We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”.

                Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”.

                So what exactly is your point?