• KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Eh, it’s decently low latency. Around 40ms or so. That doesn’t make it useful for them though. There’s absolutely no -legitimate- reason for it in the white house. As for illegitimate reasons, why could Musk possibly want a connection inside the white house that has no oversight other than his own…?

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        60+Ms at a minimum is not low latency. What are you on about? I have 10ms from coast to coast on residential fiber.

        Government installs which were previously on fiber are being switched to this bullshit. Fiber international interconnect to Australia right now is 13ms from DC to Sydney. Big fucking difference.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s a good backup internet service to avoid BIFF. But it reads like they are piping in internet from a datacenter, so just using starlink as an ISP.

    Why? $$$. I bet the whitehouse spends a lot on internet.

    Also, it’s probably really easy to perform traffic inspection using starlink vs an established, regulated ISP.