Not saying the sentiment is wrong, but that was a pretty lame article.
so you’re not saying something, but saying something not-that? ish? sorta? if one squints? with no detail?
wow, wonderful contribution. brb calling Plato to inform them of their dethroning in the face of your mighty reason
Comment was about as shallow as the article, so only fitting. It just listed same talkikg points, that are common in AI critique, didn’t even present those particularly well, didn’t bring anything new to the convo.
I would had been all in on reading actually decent in depth AI critique.
But this was just “top 10 talking points for AI haters we can hate together”. I’m a AI hater but I don’t want to read low quality junk media that just confirms my bias without nuance.
So sorry you wasted the five seconds it took to tell that the thing someone felt like sharing was not, in fact, the latest volume of the Oxbridge Handbook of Deep Analysis and Arguments for the Ages.
Weird hill to die on, gn.
I’m not dying on a hill; I’m saying that you’re coming off as a pompous twit who will get themselves banned from the community the moment I or the other mods find your pompous twittery no longer amusing.
Edit to add: Whoops! That already happened whilst I was typing the above. Enjoy your free trip to the egress.
oh do fuck off
